All Pornography Is Homoerotic


By Judith A. Reisman, Ph.D. (April, 2005)

Author of Kinsey, Sex & Fraud, “Soft Porn” Plays Hardball, and Kinsey, Crimes & Consequences

A young female Marine who often helped with my research, brought a fellow male officer to help move my steel filing cabinets into a larger space. Later, over coffee, the young man politely asked how my research had led me to conclude that Playboy and all other pornography is homoerotic? I spent about an hour answering his questions as to why, after decades of research, I finally understood what I had recalled reading by some liberal philosopher, that all pornography is inherently homosexual. The next morning the female officer called me to say that at sunrise she found the barracks dumpster filled with Playboys and similar magazines. When she asked her friend if this was due to what he had said to the men in his unit, he told her the following story.

Pornography Is Homoeroticism in Practice

“I reported what Dr. Reisman showed me to my buddies. Pornography is “homo” sex – that is it’s sex made by men to arouse men and boys. Pornography causes boys to have sex with themselves, psychopharmacologically conditioning them early to male sexual touch. Pornography claims our sisters, daughters, even our moms are non-human animals. Although human women, unlike dogs or monkeys, never go into “heat” (“estrus”), women and girls are posed by pornographers soliciting sex from everyone, everywhere, eye pupils dilated, intimate body parts and lips reddened, often bent over, rump up, to imitate primate females in “heat.” Normal boys are unconsciously made anxious, angry, ashamed, fearful of these airbrushed, naked women “in rut/heat.” Everywhere they wink, open their mouths, sigh, moan for penetration. Smiling paper and celluloid dolls promise everything and deliver nothing more than a man or boy can do for himself-thanks to the men who provide the sex images.”

“The females in our lives, now and later, too often end up paying for the pornographically based frustration, rage and betrayal boys and men feel toward them. Pornographic images repeatedly show consumers that women love oral and anal sodomy – the only form of homosexual penetration. Males learn that “real” women seek to sexually please males by engaging in what are known historically and cross culturally as deviant homosexual practices.”

“Pornography is “heterophobic,” as it stimulates fear, disrespect, and not infrequently, hatred of the opposite sex. Real man-woman-sex, requires intimacy, love, monogamy, fidelity, privacy, yes, in marriage, an opening for children and growing old together with her mate. Hetero-woman-based sex is generative, it is “heterophilic.”

[The young officer went on:] “You finally get past hunting for a “paint by numbers” woman and fall in love. She trusts you and thinks you want her only, and forever. Your wife wants affection, hugs and kisses. She wants to see your face, your eyes-the window to your soul – when you are intimate but soon you are asking her to do the things you saw in pornography, to try one kind of sodomy then the other–to watch pornography “together,” to do things “real women” in pornography do. You are asking her to have sex like a gay guy would! We get angry at our wives for sensing how degraded they are as homoerotic stand-ins. We are angry our wives don’t look and act like the paper dolls we’ve used and controlled.”

“Our wives don’t know what is wrong. Neither do we. The seeds of destruction were sown so long ago that answers today are hard to find. Sometimes we go to church or read so-called religious sex or marriage aid books that say breathe life into a marriage with sodomy, “variety,” or “erotic stories and sexy pictures” (pornography). We do, and gradually separate more from one another. So our wives, to save our marriages, try to please us. But pornography sets up a no-win situation for all. The more women do sexy weird things the less respect and intimacy we feel. And if women don’t do the sexy weird things we blame and resent them. (Of course, just as some men use pornography to seduce young girls, homosexuals similarly use “girlie” magazines to seduce boys.) Seeking what is really homoerotic “excitement” we often ‘fall out’ of love, more easily divorce and abandon our wives, even our children. (Remember, reproduction isn’t possible in sodomy). I think Dr. Reisman had it right.”

Until Kinsey and Hefner (his “pamphleteer” post 1953), western men and their sex laws largely looked to women for guidance of the sexual life. Following the Kinsey-Hefner homoerotic libels of the Greatest Generation, men began replacing the civilizing force of womanly intimacy with the homoerotic pornography model of the sexual revolution. Instead of the stronger more satisfying sexuality and marriages promised by liberal sexperts, dysfunction, divorce and sex crime is rampant. He said, “Bottom line: Playboys aren’t men. It takes a real man to be a husband and a father and to make a woman – his wife – beloved for a lifetime.” When the young officer finished talking, his buddies silently considered the unforeseen consequences of their naiveté. By morning the base dumpster was filled with Playboy, Penthouse and other pornography. End of true story!

Measuring “Values”: All Pornography Is Homoerotic

The young officer did his fellows a great service by alerting them to the perils of pornography. That all pornography is homoerotic is objectively reflected in an analysis of the pornographic value system compared to the heterosexual value system. Following are 50 key sociosexual cultural values, extracted from public policy speeches and statements.

 

MEASURING THE “FIT” OF 50 SOCIOSEXUAL CULTURAL VARIABLES AS VALUES:

PLAYBOY & HOMOSEXUALITY COMPARED TO HETEROSEXUALITY

50 Key Sociosexual Variables

Defining Heterophobic v. Heterophilic

Views and Values in Images and Text

Playboy/all Pornographies

As Homoerotic/Heterophobic

In Images and Text

“Gay” Policies & Demands as Homoerotic/Heterophobic

In Images and Text

Heterosexuality: Sexual Ideal

of Judeo-Christian Biblical

belief as Heterophilic.

1. Abstinence outside of marriage

AGAINST

AGAINST

FOR

2. Abortion

FOR

FOR

AGAINST

3. AIDS/STDs As Sexual Conduct

AGAINST CHANGE

AGAINST CHANGE

FOR CONDUCT CHANGE

4. Alcohol Excess

FOR

FOR

AGAINST

5. Alimony

AGAINST

AGAINST

FOR

6. Anal sodomy

FOR

FOR

AGAINST

7. Adultery

FOR

FOR

AGAINST

8. Bachelorhood

FOR

FOR

AGAINST

9. Bestiality

FOR

FOR

AGAINST

10. Birth illegitimate

FOR

FOR

AGAINST

11. Bisexuality

FOR

FOR

AGAINST

12. “Bondage” and Burlesque

FOR

FOR

AGAINST

13. Capital punishment

AGAINST

AGAINST

COMMONLY FOR

14. Chastity/virginity

AGAINST

AGAINST

FOR

15. Child/adult sex

FOR

FOR

AGAINST

16. Condoms for kids

FOR

FOR

AGAINST

17. Dial-a-porn

FOR

FOR

AGAINST

18. Dildo/ sex “toys”

FOR

FOR

AGAINST

19. “Dirty” talk

FOR

FOR

AGAINST

20. Drugs/illicit

FOR

FOR

AGAINST

21. Fetal Experiments

FOR

FOR

AGAINST

22. Homosexuality

FOR

FOR

AGAINST

23. Incest (“loving”)

FOR

FOR

AGAINST

24. Judeo-Christianity

AGAINST

AGAINST

FOR

25. Love (Life Commitment)

AGAINST

AGAINST

FOR

26. Marriage/fidelity

AGAINST

AGAINST

FOR

27. Masturbation

FOR

FOR

AGAINST

28. “Missionary” Position

AGAINST

AGAINST

FOR (face to face full coitus)

29. Motherhood

AGAINST

AGAINST

FOR

30. No-fault divorce

FOR

FOR

AGAINST

31. Old age

AGAINST

AGAINST

FOR

32. Orgies

FOR

FOR

AGAINST

33. Oral sodomy

FOR

FOR

AGAINST

34. Penetration/genital intercourse as

culmination of sexual interaction

AGAINST-all “orgasms” —

as equal: sodomy, self-abuse

AGAINST-all “orgasms” as

equal to sodomy masturbation, etc.

FOR face-to-face, lip-to-lip,

marital coitus exclusive, ideal

35. Pornography

FOR

FOR

AGAINST

36. Private Sex

AGAINST

AGAINST

FOR (only in private space)

37. Prostitution

FOR

FOR

AGAINST

38. Public sex

FOR

FOR

AGAINST

39. Rape-trickery

FOR

FOR

AGAINST

40. Religion: new age

FOR

FOR

AGAINST

41. Romantic courtship

AGAINST

AGAINST

FOR

42. Satanic themes/entertainment

FOR

FOR

AGAINST

43. Sadism (sexual)

FOR

FOR

AGAINST

44. Seduction laws

AGAINST

AGAINST

FOR

45. Sex crime laws

AGAINST

AGAINST

FOR

46. Sex exhibition

FOR

FOR

AGAINST

47. Sex education

FOR

FOR

AGAINST

48 Suicide Right to– (euthanasia)

FOR

FOR

AGAINST

49. Traditional family

AGAINST

AGAINST

FOR

50. Voyeurism

FOR

FOR

AGAINST

 

In sum, empirical measurement finds Pornography and Homoerotica promoting abortion, anal sodomy, bestiality, child-adult sex, etc while the Judeo-Christian moral belief opposes such conduct and supports chastity, monogamy, fidelity, etc. The only area in which Pornography and Homoerotica vary is in the shape of an object to “penetrate.” But, as both equate masturbation, sodomy, fantasy, etc., with real “eye-to-eye, lip-to-lip, body-to-body intercourse” (a feat impossible for homosexuals), it would be fair to rate Pornography and Homosexuality as sharing a 100% value system.

Measuring the three above variables and practices yields an objective 100% pornography/homosexual “fit” among all 50 values, that would result breeding fear, shame, genital sensation that commonly triggers image and fantasy dependence. If mislabeled as “sexual arousal” (as millions tragically know), pornography can lead to sexual dysfunctions/addictions that destroy one’s ability to experience Love and normal sexual expression.

Pornography is a pedagogical tool teaching boys and men as well as girls and women to view the female sex as sinister, unfaithful, animalized and in doing so, to be unconsciously, neurologically reshaped by homoerotic values and practices. All pornography weakens the Trust/Devotion/Love Experience, thus all pornography saps Love of its unique power to employ the sexual experience to strengthen and unify husband and wife bond as they face life’s many tests and trials.

Endnotes:

[1] Key Sources: Playboy/pornography ethic (on record in Reisman’s U.S. Department of Juvenile Justice study of “Images of Children, Crime and Violence in Playboy, Penthouse and Hustler” #84-JN-AX-K007); The Homoerotic Ethic (The Gay Rights Platform, 1969, The Advocate, etc); and the Heterosexual Ethic (the Old and New Testaments/American legal history). Draft.

 


Key Sources: Playboy/pornography ethic (on record in Reisman’s U.S. Department of Juvenile Justice study of “Images of Children, Crime and Violence in Playboy, Penthouse and Hustler” #84-JN-AX-K007); The Homoerotic Ethic (The Gay Rights Platform, 1969, The Advocate, etc); and the Heterosexual Ethic (the Old and New Testaments/American legal history). Draft.

Get More Content Like This!


Comments

comments