Release Date: October 28, 2011
Starring: Justin Timberlake, Amanda
Seyfried, Olivia Wilde,
Genre: Science Fiction
Audience: Teenagers and adults
Runtime: 109 minutes
Distributor: 20th Century Fox/News Corp.
Director: Andrew Niccol
Executive Producer: Andrew Z. Davis, Amy Israel,
Producer: Andrew Niccol, Marc Abraham,
Writer: Andrew Niccol
Address Comments To:Rupert Murdoch, Chairman/CEO, News Corp.
Chase Carey, President/COO, News Corp.
Tom Rothman and Jim Gianopulos, Chairmen/CEO, Fox Filmed Entertainment
20th Century Fox Film Corp. (Fox Searchlight Pictures/Fox Atomic/FoxFaith)
10201 West Pico Blvd.
Los Angeles, CA 90035
Phone: (310) 369-1000
Justin Timberlake plays Wil Salas, who’s fighting every day to live just a little longer, usually having only one day left. His fortunes go up though when Wil saves an extremely rich man, who in turns gives Wil all of his years. On his mother’s birthday, she clocks out of time and dies in his hands. In distress, Wil decides to transfer time zones into the richest, in order to “pay them back for what they have done.” Meeting a wealthy bank owner’s daughter, Sylvia, Wil takes her captive when the police, known as timekeepers, come for his arrest due to suspicions about his newfound years.
As a ransom, Wil asks Sylvia’s father, Philippe, to turn in a thousand years to the bank in the slum area so that the poor people can get out loans. Philippe doesn’t give the time, however. This leads to the already rebellious Sylvia willingly staying with Wil in the slums.
Sylvia and Wil work together stealing from her father’s banks to give to the poor. All the while, the Timekeepers are out to get the two of them, along with the local slum gang leader.
IN TIME clearly had a large budget, but this doesn’t negate the issue of the cheesy dialogue. The writer/director, Andrew Niccol (GATTACA and THE TRUMAN SHOW), doesn’t hit the mark this time. He creates dialogue viewers have always heard time and time again in this genre. Worse, there’s clearly a strong humanist, communist message of taking from the rich and giving to the poor in order for everyone to be on the same level. The rich are seen as greedy and lack compassion, whereas the poor are justified in their fight to live, and, if that means stealing from the rich, then they have that right. An emphasis on giving loans to the poor is also a big theme.
MOVIEGUIDE® rejects this kind of unbiblical politics of envy. As one pundit put it, redistributing wealth like the protagonist does in this movie is just “trickle up poverty.”
All in all, IN TIME is a stereotypical science fiction movie with major worldview problems. Media-wise viewers won’t want to waste their time with IN TIME. Instead, they’d probably prefer checking out the writer/director’s other, better movies, THE TRUMAN SHOW, THE TERMINAL, or GATTACA.
IN TIME is a stereotypical science fiction movie with a strong humanist, communist attitude and cheesy dialogue. It clearly has communist message of taking from the rich and giving to the poor so everyone can be on the same level. As one pundit put it, that’s “trickle up poverty.” MOVIEGUIDE® rejects this kind of unbiblical politics of envy. IN TIME also has some very strong violence, foul language, and innuendo. Don’t waist your time with IN TIME. Instead, media-wise viewers probably would want to check out the writer/director’s other works, such as THE TRUMAN SHOW, THE TERMINAL, or GATTACA.