A QUESTION OF ELIGIBILITY
Manchurian President
Content +4
Quality
| None | Light | Moderate | Heavy | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Language | ||||
| Violence | ||||
| Sex | ||||
| Nudity |
Release Date: September 14th, 2009
Distributor: WND Films
Director: Credit withheld for fear of government reprisals
Executive Producer: Joseph Farah
Address Comments To:
WND FilmsA WorldNetDaily Company
Los Angeles
Phone: (310) 961-4170
Website: www.wndbooks.com
Email: inquiry@wndbooks.com
Content:
(BBB, C) Very strong moral worldview with an underlying Christian perspective exposing political treachery; no foul language; no violence; no sex; no nudity; no alcohol; no smoking or drug references; and, nothing objectionable.
Summary:
A QUESTION OF ELIGIBILITY is an important, in-depth examination of why it matters if Barack Obama was constitutionally ineligible to serve as president. When you watch this excellent documentary, you know that Obama is a stealth candidate who’s perpetrating the destruction of our right to life, liberty and pursuit of happiness.
Review:
* DVD GUIDE **
HEADLINE: ** Manchurian President **
Title: A QUESTION OF ELIGIBILITY
Quality: * * * Acceptability: +4
SUBTITLES: None
WARNING CODES:
Language: None
Violence: None
Sex: None
Nudity: None
RATING: Not Rated
RELEASE: 2009
TIME: 100 minutes
STARRING: N/A
DIRECTOR: Credit withheld for fear of government reprisals
PRODUCERS: Credit withheld for fear of government reprisals
EXECUTIVE PRODUCER: Joseph Farah
WRITER: Credit withheld for fear of government reprisals
BASED ON THE NOVEL/PLAY BY: N/A
DISTRIBUTOR: WND Films
CONTENT: (BBB, C) Very strong moral worldview with an underlying Christian perspective exposing political treachery; no foul language; no violence; no sex; no nudity; no alcohol; no smoking or drug references; and, nothing objectionable.
GENRE: Documentary
INTENDED AUDIENCE: All ages
HEADLINE: ** Manchurian President **
Title: A QUESTION OF ELIGIBILITY
Quality: * * * Acceptability: +4
SUBTITLES: None
WARNING CODES:
Language: None
Violence: None
Sex: None
Nudity: None
RATING: Not Rated
RELEASE: 2009
TIME: 100 minutes
STARRING: N/A
DIRECTOR: Credit withheld for fear of government reprisals
PRODUCERS: Credit withheld for fear of government reprisals
EXECUTIVE PRODUCER: Joseph Farah
WRITER: Credit withheld for fear of government reprisals
BASED ON THE NOVEL/PLAY BY: N/A
DISTRIBUTOR: WND Films
CONTENT: (BBB, C) Very strong moral worldview with an underlying Christian perspective exposing political treachery; no foul language; no violence; no sex; no nudity; no alcohol; no smoking or drug references; and, nothing objectionable.
GENRE: Documentary
INTENDED AUDIENCE: All ages
In Brief:
A QUESTION OF ELIGIBILITY is an important, in-depth examination of why it matters if Barack Obama was constitutionally ineligible to serve as president. In the process, it reveals a tremendous amount of information about Obama. The documentary combines excellent clips from news programs and good commentary from some astute thinkers, including Dr. Jerome Corsi, Alan Keyes, and Janet Porter. The case is made that Obama has purposely hidden his past. It is also clear that many people, including many in the mass media, have been complicit in aiding Obama in this cover up. Not only has Obama’s birth certificate been hidden, but also his transcripts and articles from his school days. Never before in history has this happened.
When you watch A QUESTION OF ELIGIBILITY, you know that Obama is a stealth candidate who’s perpetrating the destruction of our right to life, liberty and pursuit of happiness. As such, it is highly recommended watching and should ignite a firestorm of criticism. Technically, the movie is very good, but it could have been edited to be more condensed and concise. Thus, it makes the same point several times. That said, it’s highly recommended.
When you watch A QUESTION OF ELIGIBILITY, you know that Obama is a stealth candidate who’s perpetrating the destruction of our right to life, liberty and pursuit of happiness. As such, it is highly recommended watching and should ignite a firestorm of criticism. Technically, the movie is very good, but it could have been edited to be more condensed and concise. Thus, it makes the same point several times. That said, it’s highly recommended.
