This is your opportunity to see the Movieguide® Awards on your Television!
Tonight, March 3rd, the awards will be on the Reelz Channel.
Check it out at 7:30pm Pacific/ 10:30pm Eastern.
To find out what channel The Movieguide Awards will be on in your area, click here:
Screenwriting Contest with the Largest Cash Prize of Any Similar U.S. Competition Announces Its First Annual Finalists
Hollywood, Calif. – Dr. Ted Baehr, founder of Movieguide®: The Family Guide to Movies and Entertainment, announced the top eight finalists for the inaugural Chronos Prize for Inspiring Screenplays by Established Filmmakers. Awarding $50,000 to the top entry, the Chronos Prize will be the largest cash prize for any competition of its kind in the U.S.
Supported by a grant from the John Templeton Foundation and set to be presented annually by Movieguide®, the Chronos Prize is designed to encourage professional and established writers to create stories that are compelling, entertaining, inspiring, spiritually uplifting, and increase man’s love or understanding of God.
“We are incredibly honored to recognize, in a significant way, the important contributions of established filmmakers in bringing family and faith centered stories to worldwide audiences,” Dr. Baehr said. “As we celebrate the beginning of the Chronos Prize – we are excited and hopeful that this well deserved recognition will be a vital tool in reshaping the future of the film and television industries.”
The winner will be announced at the 22nd Annual Faith & Values Awards Gala and Report to the Entertainment Industry on Feb. 7, 2014 at the Universal Hilton Hotel in Los Angeles.
This year’s finalists are (in alphabetical order):
Brian Bird and John Wierick of Dove Canyon, CA for THE MAGNOLIA PASSION
Art D’Alessandro of Maitland, FL for MIRACLE BOY
Nathan Frankowski and Matt Chandler of Camarillo, CA for LITTLE DRUMMER BOY
Matthew G. Hill and Landon Johnson of Anaheim, CA for BURNING AT BOTH ENDS
Heather Hughes and Kate Wharton of Seattle, WA for MERRY ME
Mark Nowrasteh of Austin, TX for END OF THE EARTH
Brad Silverman of Lancaster, CA for WHEN LIFE GIVES YOU LEMONS
Rusty Whitener and Ann Tatlock of Pulaski, VA for PROMISES TO KEEP
Begun in 2013, with its inaugural year completing in February 2014, the Chronos Prize is designed to help established filmmakers who have made successful faith-friendly and faith-based movies and television programs and screenplays. It intends to reward successful established filmmakers who endeavor to create stories that are compelling, entertaining, inspiring, spiritually uplifting, and increase man’s love or understanding of God.
In addition to the Chronos Prize, the highlight of the MOVIEGUIDE® Awards each year is the presentation of the two $100,000 Epiphany Prizes for Inspiring Movies & TV. Also supported by a grant from the John Templeton Foundation, the Epiphany Prizes honor the best, most inspiring movie and television program of the previous year.
Author of “The Culture-Wise Family” and “How To Succeed in Hollywood (Without Losing Your Soul),” Dr. Baehr is chairman of the Christian Film & Television Commission® (CFTVC) and its family guide to movies and entertainment, Movieguide® (www.movieguide.org). CFTVC and Movieguide® are an international, non-profit ministry dedicated to “redeeming the values of the entertainment industry by influencing industry executives and by informing and equipping the public about the influence of the entertainment media.”
At the Faith & Values Awards, Dr. Baehr will present highlights from Movieguide®’s 2013 Report to the Entertainment Industry, a comprehensive financial analysis of the movie business showing what kinds of movies and what kinds of movie content moviegoers favor the most with their hard-earned money.
For more information about Movieguide® or CFTVC, visit www.movieguide.org or call 1-888-248-6689.
The John Templeton Foundation (www.templeton.org) funds independent research and public engagement to pursue big questions and discoveries on life’s purpose, human potential, and ultimate reality. The Foundation’s motto, “How little we know, how eager to learn,” exemplifies its support for open-minded inquiry, commitment to rigorous scientific research and related scholarship, and encouraging civil, informed dialogue among scientists, scholars, theologians, and the public at large.
By Carl Kozlowski, Contributing Writer
Most movies are designed to provide escape for audiences wanting to take their minds off the sometimes harsh realities of life. In contrast, OUT OF THE FURNACE, actually shines an unflinching light on the lives of Russell and Rodney Baze, two fictional yet highly realistic and relatable brothers slogging their way through life in the dying steel town of Braddock, Pennsylvania.
Rodney, played by Casey Affleck, is a soldier suffering from Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) after serving four grueling tours of duty in Iraq and Afghanistan. His brother Russell, played by Christian Bale, is struggling with plenty of other problems himself. He’s working hard days in the same steel mill that made his elderly father fall sick, is using his wages to pay off Rodney’s gambling debts and care for his bedridden father, and accidentally kills a mother and child in a traffic accident.
By the time he gets out of prison, Russell has lost his girlfriend – whom he hoped to marry – to another man. With all that weighing on him, Russell finds himself facing the greatest crisis of his life: saving his brother Rodney from his dangerous involvement in an illegal fighting ring run by a vicious criminal named Harlan DeGroat (Woody Harrelson).
FURNACE is an often bleak movie, and its frequently profane language, violent actions, and the villain’s illegal drug use make it a movie that’s not appropriate for family audiences. However, it has a sympathetic portrayal of the stresses our soldiers face coming home. Also, it respectfully shows Russell as a man of faith, who attends Catholic Mass even while behind bars and in the face of the crisis regarding his brother.
Christian Bale, Casey Affleck, Woody Harrelson, and actress Zoe Saldana answered questions about the movie recently alongside the movie’s writer-director, Scott Cooper, whose prior debut film CRAZY HEART earned Jeff Bridges a Best Actor Oscar.
They discussed the movies’ more heartfelt and more positive aspects in an interesting way that was more thought-provoking than the average press conference.
Question: This movie has strong family values and a unique small-town location. How did you pick these themes and places, and how did it affect the performances?
SCOTT COOPER: I grew up in a small town in Appalachia, in Virginia, as the grandson of a coal miner and spent a lot of time in small town America. While I was touring with my first film CRAZY HEART, I was reading a great deal about Braddock, Pennsylvania (where FURNACE is set) and what the town had undergone in the past five to seven years with economic troubles and the loss of the steel industry, it was important to me to shine a light on not only small towns, but what we as Americans have undergone these past five turbulent years. That blue collar milieu was familiar to me yet under-represented in films. It was very prevalent in the 1970s but not since then. I wanted to see that represented on screen again because I knew these people very well, their values and mores, and could weave all those things into a narrative in a very personal way.
CASEY AFFLECK: There’s a story just in the way the place looks, a place that was once bustling, and is now something else. It has a lot of atmosphere. Normally you’re on a set, and a lighting set up takes 20 minutes, and you’re normally staring at a bunch of plywood in the fake interiors, but in this movie, you go in another real room. You’re not staring at a bunch of plywood, but a real house you’re supposed to be in. It really grounds you.
CHRISTIAN BALE: There’s a world that the camera creates and the broader world beyond it. This time, we were so immersed that we were easily in the broader world and that helped make it real.
ZOE SALDANA: You walk into a town like this and gain a really unique insight. It’s very easy to walk away when things go wrong, but to stick around and basically give life to a town because of everything it gave you generation after generation after generation, that’s a real mark of a true American – sticking together when it gets really rough. I’ve been to places around the world that can give you knots in your stomach and Braddock was one of those places, but once you sit down with those people, you wish you had an ounce of the strength that they possess every day in sticking around. That was something I was really very moved by.
MOVIEGUIDE: Woody, you were as scary as we’ve ever seen you, yet extremely relaxed. Does that come easy to you?
WOODY HARRELSON: You want to be relaxed as possible, even if you’re doing something intense, so you’re basically in a state of dynamic relaxation. I didn’t feel there was anything natural about playing Harlan DeGroat.
COOPER: The very last shot of the film was the first one we shot. When we finished, Woody walked over and hugged me and said, “I never wanted to shed a character more in my life.” Truly I wanted Woody to represent the very worst of America, and Christian to represent the best. Hopefully we succeeded in that dichotomy. As someone with a very limited career as an actor, you realize once you see these guys in action, you see the work and see the other side of the lens, and you quickly realize the difference between being modestly talented and how gifted they are.
Question: It’ interesting how Christian’s character is in church, and in chapel in prison. Was there any particular backstory motivated you to have the character be that way?
COOPER: When I was writing the character, I always thought of him as a very good man who was beset on all sides by a relentless fate. It was based on someone in my life who has suffered a tremendous amount of pain and loss, and who is also one of the most positive people I know and has given me a great source of inspiration. That man’s faith has carried him through, whether with absolution or whatever he was asking for. …For me, to have Russell Baze have that kind of seeking faith as he’s doing things that are morally questionable and put him in real risk was important.
Directors can go their whole career without telling personal stories. I don’t even consider it work. It’s a privilege to have actors of this caliber help me reach my vision. They were always questioning, taking a script that was well written and elevating it in every way. Making me understand who I was as a person. After the modest success of my first film, I found it very daunting to live with those expectations. After growing up with very little money and still having very little after CRAZY HEART, you can get tempted to make movies for the wrong reasons. They want you to make that movie, but you can’t, you have to stick to your artistic worldview and this was a personal story that was charged and emotional. It was a risk, certainly. I could have taken a much less risky route after my first film, but as one of my filmmaking heroes, Francis Ford Coppola, said, “If you’re not taking the highest greatest risk, why are you filming?”
Question: Casey, you gave a very raw real performance of soldier returning from Iraq, especially talking about what you’d seen over there. Did you do any special preparation?
CASEY AFFLECK: Not really, you start by making notes a few months before the shoot, over and over and talking to Scott lot about where he’s coming from, but [PTSD] is not too much of the film. Watching documentaries and talking to veterans, feeling as much as you can what that experience might be like for somebody. These guys are doing more tours than ever before, so there’s a constant level of anxiety and a lack of understanding what those symptoms are when they come back. People don’t want to hear what their experiences were. They would often rather forget about that stuff and here you are in your living room, trying to be in whatever moment you’re in and not bring it into every moment of your life. And, hope that it doesn’t bubble up in your consciousness at the wrong time.
By Natalie Fertig
Movieguide® is at Comic-Con in San Diego, CA to find out about the new movie, THE EUROPA REPORT. Directed by Sebastian Cordero, this movie tells the story of an expedition to Jupiter’s moon Europa, and the discovery of extraterrestrial life.
As producer Ben Browning shared at the panel, which included NASA scientists as well as members of the cast and crew, THE EUROPA REPORT was created out of a desire for “a movie about extraterrestrial life that didn’t cheat anything.”
With two recent STAR TREK blockbusters and three new STAR WARS movies on the way, sci-fi is having a heyday in filmmaking. However, THE EUROPA REPORT is designed to break out of the traditional science fiction mold.
A lower-budget production, what the movie lacks in CGI visual effects, it makes up for in scientific accuracy. Director Sebastian Cordero explained that they wanted to create a movie that would act as a true “what if?” scenario. If humans were to actually succeed in finding life somewhere in our solar system, where would they find it, and how would it happen?
Kevin Hand and Steven Vance, two NASA scientists who consulted on the movie, were on hand to speak about the science involved. They explained that Europa, one of Jupiter’s moons, was chosen because of its massive amounts of liquid water – an element that most astronomers and biologists agree is the key to life on another planet.
THE EUROPA REPORT is designed to look and feel like a faux-documentary made about the Europa journey. The science aspect isn’t as much the fodder for plot points (as in STAR TREK) as it is its own character in the movie.
THE EUROPA REPORT is rated PG-13, and Movieguide® cannot yet give an acceptability or quality rating yet, but for science buffs this may be one to monitor.
By David Outten, Production Editor
What do you love to do?
Some people love to cook, to paint, to sing, to write, to garden, and in many other ways to “do” something. Some are passionate about writing software, designing cars, creating businesses, making movies, or teaching.
Others are happiest to be watching. They’re content when they can watch television, look at Facebook, or read a magazine. To work, cook, or clean is drudgery.
This may have been the case throughout history. For some, life is an opportunity to “do” things. For others, life is about things they simply “have” to do. For that group, the mass media provides a respite from their drudgery.
Drudgery can be reduced with microwave meals, fast food, and bags of chips. You can even go to restaurants with large screen televisions to permit others to cook while you continue to be entertained.
Media can be like a drug that puts its users into a stupor. Have you ever looked at the expression of someone as they watch television? Situation comedies use canned laughter because actual audiences seldom crack a smile.
Media tends not to be interactive. Viewers are simply biochemical receiving units monitored by marketing research firms to arrive at prices for advertising. It’s one-way “communication.” The viewer is being talked to knowing that there’s no one to talk back to.
Look at a person in an actual conversation. They look more alert because every comment they hear may require a response. Every comment they make may involve gestures, or at least facial expressions appropriate for the dialogue.
When hours and hours of every day are spent consuming media, what happens to the desire to “do” rather than to “watch?”
There are young people who have difficulty deciding on a career because they can’t think of anything they’d like to do but absorb media. Everything is drudgery compared to being entertained. There are children who’d rather watch television than be involved in physical play.
On the other hand, there are people who love to “do.” They love to cook, draw, write, compose music, garden, or fish. And, even if they’re not talking to someone while doing what they love, chances are their facial expressions are more alive than those of television spectators.
The question is, “Does heavy media consumption create people who don’t want to “do” anything, or do people with no desire to “do” anything become excessive media consumers?”
It could be some of both, but the average American apparently spends eight and a half hours a day as media consumers. Those who love to do things, no doubt, spend less time with media, and those who don’t like to “do” spend more time, but on average Americans spend an entire work week just watching media.
Children brought up “just watching” may find it more difficult to begin “doing” as adults. They may also struggle with finding anything they enjoy doing. For them, employment becomes drudgery. Opportunities to escape drudgery with the help of family financial assistance or government aid look more attractive to “watchers” than “doers.”
If you want your children to be “doers” rather than “watchers,” cook with them. Get them out in the garden. Take them fishing. Draw with them. Encourage “doing.” Get excited and praise them when they “do.” Limit how much time they can “watch.” Watch programs with them that teach how to “do.” Discuss doing what has been taught or try actually doing it. On the Internet, you can look up videos on how to grow tomatoes, make sushi, fish for bass, or turn a photograph into a work of art with software like Photoshop. You can also learn how cars are made or how money is made in the stock market. Don’t just watch movies. Learn how they are made. Help get your children excited about “doing” something.
Life is really much better if you enjoy “doing.” How miserable life must be if doing any task is drudgery. It can be depressing to forward to all the things you “have” to do (like going to the dentist). Life is so much better when you look forward to doing things.
The mass media not only creates the culture in our society, it also creates the culture in our families, and in our hearts and minds. How media is used in your family may determine if your children grow up to be depressed or excited about life.
Do you want to be a doer or a watcher?