What You Need To Know:
WHERE THE HEART IS contains some foul language and a lax, immoral take on premarital sex. It also has some anti-Christian content, an uneven story, inconsistent acting by the two romantic leads, and spiritually confused characters that dilute the positive aspects of its production quality and worldview. Ultimately, WHERE THE HEART IS needs a lot of work to meet the high standards of MOVIEGUIDE®
(RoRo, B, CC, Ab, LLL, S, V, NN, AA, DD, M) Romantic worldview with moral, Christian & anti-Christian elements including people who straighten out their lives, acts of Christian kindness, an important reference to the biblical idea of original sin, misguided religious fundamentalists carrying Bible kidnap illegitimate child & place her in the manger of a local nativity display, & former alcoholic asks God repeatedly to forgive her fornication but continues fornicating anyway; 28 obscenities & 19 mostly mild (but several strong) profanities; some implied violence such as train amputates man’s legs & some mild depicted violence including some punching, fighting & a tornado brings disaster; one scene of implied fornication & references to repeated acts of fornication, which are viewed as somewhat approipriate, though often obsessive; upper male nudity & shot of woman’s naked back after fornication; alcohol use, young man becomes a drunk & references to alcoholism & AA meetings; smoking & references to man’s pill addiction; and, serial promiscuity eventually rebuked, but not if it is a one on one relationship.
Before jumping back into that galaxy far, far away a long time ago, young actress Natalie Portman decides to spend some time in a small town in a fictional Oklahoma in WHERE THE HEART IS. A strangely distant melodrama with a few redeeming qualities, and a major moral flaw, this movie may remind viewers of the MOVIEGUIDE® Award-winning FOREST GUMP. If you don’t count the scenes of Gump as a young boy, both movies span more than a few years and pack a lot of drama, comedy, tragedy, and hope into their running time.
Portman plays Novalee Nation, a 17-year-old with a thick Southern drawl who gets impregnated by her boyfriend, Willy Jack, played by Dylan Bruno. Like the mother who also left her, Willy Jack abandons her at a Wal-Mart store in Oklahoma. Novalee secretly camps out at night in the store for six weeks, befriending a friendly but weird alcoholic woman (Stockard Channing), who calls herself “Sister Husband” and has put the sign “Welcome Woman” on the side of her truck. Novalee also befriends the town’s local intellectual, Forney Hull (James Frain), a young man who’s running things at the local library for his alcoholic sister. Forney is intrigued by the young girl and finds out she’s sleeping in the Wal-Mart. One night, he crashes through the plate glass window to deliver her baby, a girl she names Americus.
Mother and daughter become famous overnight, but the fame doesn’t last. Novalee’s own mother (Sally Field from FOREST GUMP in an insightful bit of casting) shows up, only to take the $500 that people have sent to Novalee after hearing about her story. Sister Husband takes Novalee and Americus into her large trailer home and, over the next few years, finally settles down, though she thinks she’s not “good enough” for the brainy Forney, who’s fallen in love with her. Novalee also becomes friends with an older woman, played by Ashley Judd, who has trouble finding the right man but who has no problems producing one child after another.
Meanwhile, Willy Jack does a sting in jail, becomes a one-hit country star after signing with a hardboiled agent played by Joan Cusack (Jessie in TOY STORY 2), loses his career and becomes a drunken has been. After much drama, comedy and some tragic circumstances, the two meet again in a hospital, and Willy Jack gives Novalee some important advice that will give her a different perspective on her life and the actions she herself has taken.
This last brilliant turn of events is what finally earns this movie the three stars that MOVIEGUIDE® has decided to give it, although the rest of the movie, including the two romantic leads, Portman and Frain, is quite uneven. Unlike FOREST GUMP, WHERE THE HEART IS lacks the depth of character, theme and story that made the former movie so great. This is so even though both movies have a strong melodramatic aspect to them and even though there are tremendous shifts in their tone and mood. One minute, the audience is laughing with these characters’ predicaments, the next minute, a tornado strikes, bringing tragedy, literally and figuratively. FOREST GUMP carried off this difficult task with flying colors, but WHERE THE HEART IS does not quite make it, partly due to the fact that Portman and Frain just don’t have what it takes to bring it all off properly. They are a little wooden at times. Their performances do not match the quality of Ashley Judd, Stockard Channing and Joan Cusack’s in the same movie. (Has George Lucas made a mistake by hiring Portman for the female lead in his new STAR WARS movies?)
Morally and spiritually speaking, despite some positive elements, there are several disturbing aspects to WHERE THE HEART IS. First, although the movie eventually rebukes serial sexual promiscuity, it says premarital sex is okay if you shack up with only one person. This regrettable message is accompanied by some anti-Christian content. At one point, a religious couple carrying a Bible kidnaps Novalee’s baby and leaves her in the manger of a Nativity display. The symbolism apparently is meant to sanctify the birth of the baby, but why have a religious couple carrying the Bible do it? This odd development is offensive, as is the fact that Sister Husband asks God repeatedly to forgive her fornication with her lover but continues fornicating anyway.
Ultimately, WHERE THE HEART IS needs a lot of work to meet the high standards of MOVIEGUIDE® and, hopefully, our readers. It still will be interesting to see whether the mass audience will follow our lead or take this movie to its heart, like they did with FOREST GUMP.
WHERE THE HEART IS
What You Need To Know:
Some profanities and several obscenities; nudity; and, raunchy and lewd sexual innuendos.
Stewart McBain is a wealthy and successful New York building demolition expert. Public sentiment, however, forces him to halt the demolition of a dilapidated Brooklyn tenement when protesters picket for its landmark status.
McBain, meanwhile, has had it with his spoiled, grown-up-but-still-living-at-home children who are very unaware of the hardships of everyday life. So he gives them the boot, forcing them to live in the tenement with no further assistance from him. He leaves them there to teach them a lesson and learn the meaning of “home”.
McBain’s youngest and wildest daughter is Chloe. Daphne, her older sister, is an artist with grand illusions. Jimmy, a video game fanatic, hopes to make a new game called, not surprisingly, “Demolition”. With no formal training, though, the siblings are unable to accumulate any income or sustain jobs. Consequently, they decide to open the house to other tenants to produce rent and revenue.
Chloe invites a hobo and former magician, hoping that he will teach her the tricks of the trade. Daphne invites a struggling fashion designer. While Jimmy brings in his best friend, a young and aggressive stock broker, the only one able to generate income.
The parents are grieved by their disciplinary action, but refrain from offering any help. Then, Jimmy’s stockbroker roommate manipulates the stock market so that it destroys McBain’s entire business empire. Losing everything, including their home, Mom and Dad move in with the kids only to learn that they will be evicted from this house, too. Corporately, they pool their talents to pull off a fashion show, and ultimately get back on their feet financially.
With a premise that says “home is where the heart is,” the movie unfortunately doesn’t present a family grounded in anything other than itself. What a tragedy that no one in the film told them that the Solid Rock upon which to build their home is Jesus Christ. They are a dysfunctional family, with no spiritual grounding for strength, focus or direction. When Chloe asks, “What’s it all about?” her father implies that he really doesn’t know. Even when the family begins to pull together, they still are not very appealing, nor likeable, mainly because of their this-is-all-my-own-doing, live-for-me philosophy.
This disjointed film also has female and rear male nudity, some profanities and several obscenities, lots of offensive bathroom humor that is quite raunchy, sexual innuendos, and persons that are somewhat disrespectful toward their parents. Furthermore, the acting is mediocre, so pass on this poor-to-fair unfunny picture.