HOWARD'S END Add To My Top 10

Content -1
Quality
None Light Moderate Heavy
Language        
Violence        
Sex        
Nudity        

Release Date: January 01, 1970

Starring: Anthony Hopkins, Vanessa Redgrave, Helena Bonham Carter, Emma Thompson, James Wilby, and Prunella Scales.

Genre: Societal Drama

Audience: Adults

Rating: PG

Runtime: 140 weeks

Distributor: Sony Classics

Director: James Ivory

Executive Producer:

Producer: Ruth Prawer Jhabvala ON THE NOVEL BY: E.M. Forster

Writer: Ismail Merchant

Address Comments To:

Content:

(L, H) No obscenities and 4 profanities and a humanistic worldview.


Summary:

HOWARD'S END, based on E. M. Forster's novel, concerns a romantic involvement of two English families and the inheritance of a beloved ancestral home. Photography, especially of the English countryside, is beautiful, and overall, the acting is commendable and the film well crafted. However, there is also adultery and profanity, and a heavy-handed endorsement of humanistic social justice.


Review:

HOWARD'S END, based on the novel by E.M. Forster, begins with the rejection of young Helen Schlegel by young Mr. Wilcox who states that he must go to Africa to learn his father's trade. The Schlegels are cosmopolitan, liberated, humane, and humanistic. In contrast, the Wilcox family is stuffy, crusty and complex, exuding insecurity and joylessness despite its vast wealth. Mrs. Ruth Wilcox becomes a friend of Margaret Schlegel. Just before dying, Ruth Wilcox wills the summer house, Howard's End, to Margaret. The Wilcoxes get ahold of the paper and destroy it to keep the house. Mr. Wilcox asks Margaret to marry him. After some time, a tired Mr. Wilcox, racked by one damaging incident after another, apportions his fortune to his heirs, and Howard's End is given to Margaret, the rightful owner.
Despite its humanistic bent, there is much which can be enjoyed about HOWARD'S END, such as its beautiful photography. However, regrettably, there is also adultery and profanity. It is unfortunate, however, that E. M. Forster would have employed his considerable talent to give such a heavy-handed endorsement of humanistic social justice, as he did in this case.


In Brief: