“Contemptible Storytelling”

None | Light | Moderate | Heavy | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Language | ||||
Violence | ||||
Sex | ||||
Nudity |
What You Need To Know:
In 1960’s France, this film was an esthetic sensation. Since then, Godard has become a revered cinema “artiste.” CONTEMPT is not his best work. It crawls, creaks and lurches to a predictable, crashing conclusion. Nor does the music help. The morose, moody composition by Georges Delerue is strangely disruptive and intrusive. The resurrection of this 1963 film would have been better left to cinema’s history books although Bardot is still worth viewing if one doesn’t take account of her stilted acting and her inability to make emotional connection with her co-stars and her audience. An oddly simplistic and flawed story which fails as a romance, CONTEMPT is one classic French film about which moral Americans will feel justifiable contempt
Content:
(Ro, H, L, V, NN, S) Humanist, pseudo-romantic worldview emphasizing marital tensions between a couple; 7 subtitled expletives; husband slaps wife; lower female nudity with no sexuality, but implied adultery; and, emotionally sterile characters
More Detail:
In 1960’s France, this film was an esthetic sensation. Since then, Godard has become a revered cinema “artiste.” CONTEMPT is not his best work. It crawls, creaks and lurches to a predictable, crashing conclusion. Nor does the music help. The morose, moody composition by Georges Delerue is strangely disruptive and intrusive. The resurrection of this 1963 film would have been better left to cinema’s history books although Bardot is still worth viewing if one doesn’t take account of her stilted acting and her inability to make emotional connection with her co-stars and her audience. An oddly simplistic and flawed story which fails as a romance, CONTEMPT is one classic French film about which moral Americans will feel justifiable contempt.