THE FOUR SEASONS (2025): Episode 1.1

Name: THE FOUR SEASONS (2025): Episode 1.1
Item: THE FOUR SEASONS (2025): Episode 1.1
Author: Review

"A Woke Broke Back Series"

Family Content: -3 Excessive sex, violence, immorality, and/or worldview problems. (Sometimes excessive content such as violence is in otherwise redemptive movies.)

Entertainment Quality:

	None	Light	Moderate	Heavy
Language
Violence
Sex
Nudity

Credits →

What You Need To Know:

The Netflix remake of THE FOUR SEASONS opens with three "couples" preparing for their traditional quarterly vacation, which is anything but conventional. Episode one begins with the revelation that one of the "couples" is homosexual, that one of the heterosexual leads is planning to divorce his wife, and that the others are unsure how to deal with this. But what complicates things is when the woman about to be divorced surprises her husband with a vow renewal ceremony.

The first episode of Season One of THE FOUR SEASONS is so much more boring than the 1981 original film. The fact that nothing binds these couples together by anything more substantial than "the feeling of being in love" is sad and makes it difficult for viewers to connect to anyone. Because the emptiness of Romanticist idolatry is so dominant, it becomes a story without any heart or soul. The dominant worldview is one of pagan homosexual Romanticism, which revels in its humorless depravity. This morally offensive remake of the 1981 film of the same name is about as in-your-face with its woke agenda as it could be. Though the evil outworking of these seeds planted in the first episode has yet to flower, it's clear where this series' story is headed. MOVIEGUIDE® advises that media-wise families avoid this one.

Content:

(RoRoRo, HoHoHo, Pa, LL, S, M):

Dominant Worldview and Other Worldview Content/Elements:

The dominant worldview of the series is one of pagan homosexual Romanticism which revels in its humorless depravity. This morally offensive remake of the 1981 film of the same name is about as in your face with its woke agenda as it could be. The most obvious offense is that one of the “couples” is now changed from the original film to two homosexual males, but this is only one of many;

Foul Language:

11 f words, one strong profanity, and three obscenities;

Violence:

No violence;

Sex:

Sexual references abound; two homosexual males kiss and hold each other in bed; a married couple kiss and prepare to have sex in bed and are shown waking up in the morning;

Nudity:

No nudity;

Alcohol Use:

Some social drinking;

Smoking and/or Drug Use and Abuse:

None, and,

Miscellaneous Immorality:

A man wants a divorce because he is “no longer in love” with his wife.

More Detail:

The Netflix remake of THE FOUR SEASONS opens with three “couples” preparing for their traditional quarterly vacation, which is anything but conventional. Episode one begins with the revelation that one of the “couples” is homosexual, that one of the heterosexual leads is planning to divorce his wife, and that the others are unsure how to deal with this. But what complicates things is when the woman about to be divorced surprises her husband with a vow renewal ceremony.

THE FOUR SEASONS is so much more boring than the 1981 original film. The fact that nothing binds these couples together by anything more substantial than “the feeling of being in love” is sad and makes it difficult for viewers to connect to anyone since they are all utterly selfish at the best of times. Because the emptiness of Romanticist idolatry is so dominant, it becomes a story without any heart or soul. The writing falls flat because these people ultimately have nothing meaningful to discuss. Steve Carell remains as funny as usual, but even his comedic performance can’t lift the leaden feel of this series.

The dominant worldview of the series is one of pagan homosexual Romanticism, which revels in its humorless depravity. This morally offensive remake of the 1981 film of the same name is about as in-your-face with its woke agenda as it could be. The most obvious offense is that one of the “couples” is now changed from the original film to two homosexual males, but this is only one of many.

The Romanticist abandon with which one character tells his friends he’s set on divorcing his wife was a moment for profound thought in the film. At the same time, in this series, the other “husbands” involved can only offer outrageously simplistic and jaded band aids to their “friend,” one of which is “just sleep with someone else.” Though the evil outworking of these seeds planted in the first episode has yet to flower, it’s clear where this series’ story is headed. MOVIEGUIDE® advises that media-wise families avoid this one.